2025-26 Graduate Student Survey
What 244 graduate students told us
Each year we ask graduate students in the nine HBFA departments how their funding, housing and well-being are really going. These are the main results from the survey that ran from December 2025 to January 2026.
PDF, 32 pages. Figure and page numbers on this page refer to the full report.
At a glance
244 respondents73%
can't cover their day-to-day living costs with their stipend alone
Report: Figure 18, students in funded programs
69%
of students with extra work rank extra income as their top reason for it
Report: Figure 16
1 in 2
face some level of food insecurity
Report: Figure 19
38%
rate their mental health poor or very poor
Report: Figure 22
What got better
- Food, housing and health-care insecurity held steady compared with 2024. Report: Page 2
- 46% found it easy to find information about student resources, up from about 40% in 2024. Report: Page 23, Figure 24
- 73% knew their living allowance went up, after a record low in 2024. Report: Figure 9
What didn't
- 15% rate their mental health very poor, up from 8% in 2024. Report: Figure 22
- More students live with parents or relatives, and fewer with a partner. Report: Page 18, Figure 17
- PhD students in later years of their programs report poorer mental health. Report: Figure 23
Money
Most students still need more than their stipend to get by, and most who take on extra work do it for the income.
- 73%
can't cover their day-to-day living costs with their stipend alone
Down from 84% in 2023, about the same as 2024 Report: Figure 18, students in funded programs
- 69%
of students with extra work rank extra income as their top reason for it, ahead of work experience or personal interest
Report: Figure 16
- 51%
disagree that their stipend adequately pays them for their work
22% agree Report: Figure 11
- 73%
knew their living allowance went up this year
After a record low in 2024 Report: Figure 9
Well-being
Food, housing and health-care insecurity held steady from 2024, but they haven't gone away. Mental health ratings got worse, especially for PhD students in later years of their programs.
Report: Page 2, Figures 22 and 23
Insecurity
- 66%
face some level of health-care insecurity
Report: Figure 21
- 50%
face some level of food insecurity
Report: Figure 19
- 27%
face some level of housing insecurity
Report: Figure 20
Mental health
- 38%
rate their mental health poor or very poor
Report: Figure 22
- 15%
rate their mental health very poor
Up from 8% in 2024 Report: Figure 22
Resources
Finding information got a little easier, but many free services are still unknown to most students. The most common reasons: confusing university websites and too many emails.
Finding information
- 46%
found it easy to find information about student resources
Up from about 40% in 2024. 24% found it difficult, down from about 28% Report: Page 23, Figure 24
Knew the service was there
- 7%
knew the OISE Psychology Clinic offers therapy
Report: Figure 25
- 16%
knew Coursera and other learning platforms are free for students
Report: Figure 25
- 21%
knew UTSU Tax Clinics do free 1-on-1 tax filing
Report: Figure 25
- 57%
knew about the Centre for Graduate Mentorship and Supervision (CGMS)
Fewer than 1% used it Report: Figure 25
See all 10 services
- 61%
knew about CLNx career services
About 18% used them Report: Figure 25
- 63%
knew how to book a U of T Health & Wellness appointment
Report: Figure 25
- 70%
knew U of T posts TA jobs online
Report: Figure 25
- 76%
knew about the Centre for Learning Strategy Support (CLSS)
About 6% used it Report: Figure 25
- 95%
knew most peer-reviewed articles are free through the library
Report: Figure 25
- 95%
knew about the Sports & Recreation centres
Includes students who knew the centres but not everything they offer Report: Figure 25
Why students miss them
- 78%
Hard-to-use university websites
Broken links, the same information spread over many sites, and needing the right search words.
Report: Page 24
- 40%
Too many emails
Resource news buried in long emails and mixed in with event announcements.
Report: Page 24
- 30%
Never told
Resources were never mentioned, or only once at orientation, among everything else.
Report: Page 24
Shares of the written answers that explained why students hadn't heard of resources. One answer can give more than one reason.
International students
International students told us the first year is the hardest. Satisfaction with department help moving to Canada hasn't improved, and frustration with award opportunities keeps growing.
Report: Pages 29 and 30, Figures 28 and 29
What made the first year hard
-
Paying before the first stipend
Moving costs, housing deposits and visa fees all come due before any stipend arrives.
-
Learning U of T's systems
Little practical help at the start with ACORN, Quercus and the other platforms.
-
Settling into Canada
Getting a SIN, opening a bank account, using transit and understanding UHIP.
What we're asking for
Six recommendations from the full report.
Report: Pages 3, 24, 25, 29 and 30
-
One place for every resource
A searchable hub with direct, up-to-date links, especially for mental health and insurance.
-
Clear news about funding
Departments telling students about living allowance increases in emails, orientation and department meetings.
-
Fewer, clearer emails
Resource news kept apart from event announcements, with short messages and seasonal reminders, such as tax clinics at tax time.
-
Reminders beyond orientation
Regular reminders, brief presentations in departments and a one-page resource guide every semester.
-
Help before the first stipend
A start-up advance or an earlier first stipend payment, with tuition due dates that match stipend dates.
-
A guide for new arrivals
Practical help with U of T systems, and a "Canada 101" pre-arrival guide to SIN, banking, transit and UHIP.
How we ran it
A Google Forms survey, open from December 2025 to January 2026, shared through department and faculty emails, GRC social media, graduate student associations and short presentations in required seminars and courses.
Report: Pages 2 and 4
- 244
responses from the nine departments in the Harmonized Base Funding Agreement (HBFA)
- 3,757
responses across the surveys from 2017 to 2025, so we can show how things have changed
Answers were cleaned in Python and analysed in R. Written answers were grouped into themes with help from an AI model.
People choose whether to take part, so read these numbers as a strong signal rather than a census.
The nine HBFA departments
- Biochemistry
- Immunology
- Institute of Medical Science
- Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology
- Medical Biophysics
- Molecular Genetics
- Nutritional Sciences
- Pharmacology & Toxicology
- Physiology
All 30 figures, the themes from students' written answers and every recommendation. Questions? Email grc.facmed@utoronto.ca.
The 2026-27 survey is coming
More answers make a stronger case. We'll post on Instagram when it opens.